The scalpel, the calculator and the judge in France: from technical perspective to legal evidence - Sciences Po Access content directly
Journal Articles International Journal of Law in Context Year : 2020

The scalpel, the calculator and the judge in France: from technical perspective to legal evidence

Abstract

In France, judicial expertise operates within a specific institutional framework at the same time as it covers a distinctive community of practitioners called upon for their technical or scientific knowledge to serve justice. Indeed, while experts in the US are selected by the litigants, the French model features judge-appointed experts. This model could offer better guarantee of independence and neutrality, to the point that recent developments in the US suggest the emergence of a new court-appointed expert. What does such an institutional model involve in terms of evidence production? To answer this question, this paper looks at two areas of expertise in France: economic experts and forensic pathologists. Through an ethnography of the co-production of legal evidence, it analyses the black box of the French practices of legal expertise and allows the way in which the institutional context influences the producing of legal evidence, beyond differences between a scalpel and a calculator, to be understood.

Domains

Sociology Law
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
juston_2020_international_journal_of_law_in_context.pdf (313.15 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)

Dates and versions

hal-03063937 , version 1 (01-12-2022)

Identifiers

Cite

Jérôme Pélisse, Romain Juston. The scalpel, the calculator and the judge in France: from technical perspective to legal evidence. International Journal of Law in Context, 2020, pp.353-370. ⟨10.1017/S1744552320000269⟩. ⟨hal-03063937⟩
95 View
106 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More