Economizing on Scientific Debate - Sciences Po Access content directly
Journal Articles (Book Review) Books and Ideas Year : 2018

Economizing on Scientific Debate

Abstract

The book Le négationnisme économique. Et comment s’en débarrasser by Pierre Cahuc and André Zylberberg has sparked a heated debate in the French press and academy. Its aim is to uncover the inadequacies, knowledge gaps, errors, and denials on the part of researchers and public actors who criticize economic science, and especially those who criticize the latter’s dominant current, the so-called mainstream economics. Its main targets are critical economists, particularly “heterodox” or “appalled economists,” but also intellectual figures from other scientific disciplines (Pierre Bourdieu, Michel Onfray, Dominique Méda, Axel Kahn), CEOs (Jean-Louis Beffa, Louis Gallois), politicians (Michel Rocard, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Barbara Romagnan), and newspapers (Alternatives économiques). [First paragraph]
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2018-godechot-economizing-on-scientific-debate.pdf (296.67 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Dates and versions

hal-03567392 , version 1 (12-02-2022)

Identifiers

Cite

Olivier Godechot. Economizing on Scientific Debate: About: Pierre Cahuc and André Zylberberg, Le négationnisme économique. Et comment s’en débarrasser, Flammarion. Books and Ideas, 2018. ⟨hal-03567392⟩
19 View
13 Download

Share

Gmail Mastodon Facebook X LinkedIn More