%0 Unpublished work %T Developing policy evaluation in an academic setting: assets and challenges %+ Centre de recherche sur les inégalités sociales (Sciences Po, CNRS) (CRIS) %+ Laboratoire interdisciplinaire d'évaluation des politiques publiques (Sciences Po) (LIEPP) %+ Bocconi University [Milan, Italy] %+ London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) %+ Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS) %+ Central European University [Budapest, Hongrie] (CEU) %+ National School of Political Sciences and Public Administration (SNSPA) %+ Hertie School of Governance [Berlin] %+ European University Institute (EUI) %A Revillard, Anne %A Corno, Lucia %A Fernandez, José, Luis %A Mason, Danielle %A Umbach, Gaby %A Bodenstein, Thilo %A Cartwright, Andrew %A Melenciuc, Ioana-Roxana %A Wegrich, Kai %A Stone, Diane %Z Débat du LIEPP n°7 %J Débats du LIEPP %3 Débat du LIEPP n°7 %I Laboratoire interdisciplinaire d’évaluation des politiques publiques (LIEPP, Sciences Po) %8 2023-04 %D 2023 %Z Humanities and Social Sciences/Political scienceOther publications %X Based on a seminar organized by LIEPP and CIVICA which took place at Sciences Po in June 2022, this publication brings together ten academic researchers from seven different CIVICA universities (Bocconi, CEU, EUI, Hertie School, LSE, Sciences Po, SNSPA), who are involved in various forms of policy evaluation. These contributions from Austria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Romania, and the United Kingdom, reflect on the assets and challenges of developing policy evaluation in an academic setting. The seminar was organized as part of CIVICA’s research focus on “Democracy in the 21st century”, but through the crosscutting nature of program evaluation, it is also of interest to CIVICA’s three others research streams (on societies in transition, data, and Europe revisited). The aim of this debate is thus to better understand the specificities, assets and challenges of developing evaluation from within an academic setting, in view of eventually reflecting on possible ways to collectively reinforce this practice within CIVICA, and use CIVICA as a leverage to reinforce this practice. This debate is organized around two topics, developing academic evaluative research, and the role of academic institutions in outreach and training in evaluation. Contributions are based on presentations of the experiences ofeach CIVICA partner. %G English %2 https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-04074380/document %2 https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-04074380/file/D%C3%A9bat%20du%20LIEPP%20n%C2%B07.pdf %L hal-04074380 %U https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-04074380 %~ SHS %~ SCIENCESPO %~ CNRS %~ AO-SCIENCEPOLITIQUE %~ ANR %~ LIEPP %~ LIEPP-DEBATS %~ SCPO_OA %~ CRIS