Religion and discrimination: extending the ‘disaggregative approach’ - Sciences Po Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Année : 2020

Religion and discrimination: extending the ‘disaggregative approach’

Résumé

Cécile Laborde’s disaggregation strategy, which is convincingly applied to religion, liberal neutrality, and freedom of association, should be extended to discrimination, in order to more systematically determine whether, when, and why indirect religious discrimination is unfair. Moreover, while Laborde’s distinction between the ‘Disproportionate Burden scenario’ and the ‘Majority Bias scenario’ is a powerful alternative to the discrimination-focused account of the justifiability of religious exemptions, the epistemic status of that distinction is not immediately clear. A case can be made that Disproportionate Burden and Majority Bias do not map onto different types of minority exemption claims. They are perspectives or analytical frames that may jointly and usefully be applied to most instances of such claims.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-03381035 , version 1 (15-10-2021)

Identifiants

Citer

Daniel Sabbagh. Religion and discrimination: extending the ‘disaggregative approach’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2020, 23 (1), pp.109 - 118. ⟨10.1080/13698230.2018.1487237⟩. ⟨hal-03381035⟩
18 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More