Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
New interface
Journal articles

European nuclear weapons? Zombie debates and nuclear realities

Abstract : In February 2020, French president Emmanuel Macron invited all interested European states to a “strategic dialogue” on the supposed contribution of France’s nuclear arsenal to European collective security. While certain media commentators relayed Macron’s intervention with approbation and excitement, framing the proposal as an exciting new idea that, if implemented, might boost Europe’s clout on the world stage, the dominant reaction was one of ennui. After all, the argument for Euro-nukes is far from new. In fact, several (mostly French) actors have unsuccessfully attempted to persuade European policymakers of the necessity of European nuclear weapons cooperation for more than half a century. In this article, we investigate the history, merits, and longevity of the case for European nuclear arms. Drawing on secondary literature, policymakers’ writings, and two hitherto untapped surveys of European public opinion conducted by one of the authors, we argue that the case for Euro-nukes is critically flawed with respect to security, strategic autonomy, futurity, and democratic good governance. We maintain that the continuous resurfacing of the “zombie” case for Euro-nukes is made possible by powerful organisational interests, as well as conceptual reversification resulting in enduring contradictions between nuclear vulnerabilities and claims of protection and autonomy.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Spire Sciences Po Institutional Repository Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, October 19, 2021 - 10:17:52 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, April 27, 2022 - 4:08:01 PM

Links full text




Kjolv Egeland, Benoît Pelopidas. European nuclear weapons? Zombie debates and nuclear realities. European Security, 2021, 30 (2), pp.237 - 258. ⟨10.1080/09662839.2020.1855147⟩. ⟨hal-03384731⟩



Record views