Reliability and Validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill Expert Surveys on Party Positioning - Sciences Po
Journal Articles European Journal of Political Research Year : 2010

Reliability and Validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill Expert Surveys on Party Positioning

Abstract

This research note reports on the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys (CHES), which measure national party positioning on European integration, ideology, and several European Union (EU) and non-EU policies. The reliability of expert judgments is examined and the CHES data are cross-validated with data from the Comparative Manifesto Project, the 2003 Benoit-Laver expert survey and the 2002 Rohrschneider-Whitefield survey. The dataset is available on the CHES website.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
j.1475-6765.2009.01912.x.pdf (82.26 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Publisher files allowed on an open archive
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-02182423 , version 1 (12-07-2019)

Licence

Identifiers

Cite

Liesbet Hooghe, Ryan Bakker, Anna Brigevich, Catherine de Vries, Erica Edwards, et al.. Reliability and Validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill Expert Surveys on Party Positioning. European Journal of Political Research, 2010, 49 (5), pp.687-703. ⟨10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01912.x⟩. ⟨hal-02182423⟩
135 View
481 Download

Altmetric

Share

More