The fallacy in productivity decomposition - Sciences Po Access content directly
Preprints, Working Papers, ... Year : 2021

The fallacy in productivity decomposition

Simon Bruhn
  • Function : Author
Thomas Grebel
  • Function : Author

Abstract

This paper argues that the typical practice of performing growth decompositions based on log-transformed productivity values induces fallacious conclusions: using logs may lead to an inaccurate aggregate growth rate, an inaccurate description of the microsources of aggregate growth, or both. We identify the mathematical sources of this log-induced fallacy in decomposition and analytically demonstrate the questionable reliability of log results. Using firm-level data from the French manufacturing sector during the 2009-2018 period, we empirically show that the magnitude of the log-induced distortions is substantial. Depending on the definition of accurate log measures, we find that around 60-80% of four-digit industry results are prone to mismeasurement. We further find significant correlations of this mismeasurement with commonly deployed industry characteristics, indicating, among other things, that less competitive industries are more prone to log distortions. Evidently, these correlations also affect the validity of studies that investigate the role of industry characteristics in productivity growth.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
OFCEWP2021-27.pdf (546.98 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Dates and versions

hal-03474838 , version 1 (10-12-2021)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-03474838 , version 1

Cite

Simon Bruhn, Thomas Grebel, Lionel Nesta. The fallacy in productivity decomposition. 2021. ⟨hal-03474838⟩
67 View
75 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More