Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual Methods in IO and Trade Compared - Sciences Po Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Review of Economics and Statistics Année : 2023

Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual Methods in IO and Trade Compared

Résumé

Constant elasticity of substitution (CES) demand for monopolistically competitive firm-varieties is a standard tool for models in international trade and macroeconomics. Inter-variety substitution in this model follows a simple share proportionality rule. In contrast, the standard toolkit in industrial organization (IO) estimates a demand system in which cross-elasticities depend on similarity in observable attributes. The gain in realism from the IO approach comes at the expense of requiring richer data and greater computational challenges. This paper uses the data generating process of Berry et al. (1995), BLP, who established the modern IO method, to simulate counterfactual trade policy experiments. We use the CES model as an approximation of the more complex underlying demand system and market structure. Although the CES model omits key elements of the data generating process, the errors are offsetting, allowing it to fit BLP-based predictions closely. For aggregate outcomes, it turns out that incorporating non-unitary pass-through matters more than fixing oversimplified substitution patterns.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2023_head_mayer_poor_substitutes_counterfactual_methods_in_io_and_trade_compared.pdf (2.07 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Licence : CC BY - Paternité

Dates et versions

hal-04347301 , version 1 (15-12-2023)

Licence

Paternité

Identifiants

Citer

Keith Head, Thierry Mayer. Poor Substitutes? Counterfactual Methods in IO and Trade Compared. Review of Economics and Statistics, In press, ⟨10.1162/rest_a_01369⟩. ⟨hal-04347301⟩
8 Consultations
46 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More